King Charles III and Queen Camilla marked their 20th wedding anniversary with a truly historic moment: a private meeting with Pope Francis at the Vatican.
During their state visit to Italy, the King and Queen were granted an audience with the pontiff at Casa Santa Marta, where Pope Francis is recovering following recent health complications. The Buckingham Palace released a statement saying the couple was "delighted the Pope was well enough to host them" and honored to share their anniversary wishes in person.
"What a special occasion," read the caption on the Royal Family's official X (formerly Twitter) post, accompanying the photo of the meeting.
The meeting, confirmed only on the morning it occurred, had previously been postponed due to Pope Francis’s ill health. The Pope, who had been hospitalized at Gemelli Hospital, is now recuperating and showed signs of improvement.
During the 20-minute meeting, King Charles also received warm wishes from the Pope in light of the King’s own recent cancer treatment. According to the Vatican, the Pope "reciprocated" Charles’ best wishes and expressed hope for his continued recovery.
The visit included an exchange of private gifts between the Pope and the Royal Couple, though the details remain undisclosed. What was clear, however, was the deep personal respect and warm regard shared during the visit — a rare moment of faith and diplomacy on such a symbolic day.
"The King and Queen were deeply touched by the Pope's kind remarks about their 20th wedding anniversary," said the palace in a follow-up statement.
Following their Vatican meeting, the King and Queen continued their anniversary celebrations in Rome, attending a state banquet hosted by Italian President Sergio Mattarella at the Quirinale Palace.
In a moment of royal wit, King Charles quipped:
“It really is very good of you, Mr. President, to lay on this small romantic, candle-lit dinner for two.”
The lavish dinner hosted 150 high-profile guests, including:
This highly symbolic Vatican visit was originally meant to be a major part of the King and Queen’s Italy itinerary, with planned stops like a service at the Sistine Chapel. While those plans were altered due to health concerns, the brief but meaningful audience with Pope Francis brought a deeply spiritual and diplomatic highlight to their trip.
Heartbreaking tributes have been paid to Alessandro Coatti, a London-based Italian scientist and former Royal Society of Biology (RSB) officer, whose dismembered remains were discovered in a suitcase near Santa Marta, a port city on Colombia’s Caribbean coast.
The body of the 42-year-old was found in a stream on the outskirts of the city, which serves as a gateway to popular tourist destinations like Tayrona National Park, Minca, and the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta mountains.
In a moving statement, the Royal Society of Biology said it was "devastated" by the loss of a scientist who had been integral to the organisation for nearly a decade.
“He was a passionate and dedicated scientist, leading RSB animal science work, writing numerous submissions, organising events, and giving evidence in the House of Commons,” the RSB said.
“Ale was funny, warm, intelligent, loved by everyone he worked with and will be deeply missed.”
Coatti studied at University College London (UCL) and served as Science Policy Officer, later promoted to Senior Science Policy Officer, before leaving the RSB in late 2024 to volunteer in Ecuador and travel through South America.
Investigators say parts of Mr. Coatti's dismembered body were found in a suitcase dumped in a stream near Santa Marta. According to local sources, he had recently inquired about visiting Minca, a mountainous village popular with eco-tourists and researchers.
A hotel worker told Colombian newspaper El Tiempo that Coatti had been conducting research on local animal species, further underlining his lifelong commitment to biology and conservation.
Santa Marta’s Mayor, Carlos Pinedo Cuello, announced a reward of 50 million Colombian pesos (approx. £8,940) for information leading to the arrest of those responsible.
“This crime will not go unpunished,” he wrote on X. “The criminals must know that crime has no place in Santa Marta. We will pursue them until they are brought to justice.”
Local authorities are now working with national police and diplomatic channels to gather evidence and track suspects.
Alessandro Coatti’s journey was one of dedication to science, exploration, and global understanding. From his studies at UCL to influencing animal science policy in the UK Parliament, and finally volunteering and researching in South America, Coatti embodied the values of curiosity, compassion, and service.
Tributes continue to flood social media from colleagues, scientists, and friends. The hashtag #JusticeForAlessandro is gaining traction, as the international community calls for a swift and thorough investigation.
The Royal Society of Biology concluded their tribute with words echoed by many:
“Our thoughts and best wishes go out to his friends and family at this truly awful time.”
In a dramatic development that could redefine international dynamics in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced Tuesday that Ukrainian forces captured two Chinese nationals fighting for Russia on the Donetsk front in eastern Ukraine.
“We have intelligence suggesting there are many more Chinese citizens involved than just these two,” said Zelensky in a statement on social media platform X.
According to Ukrainian officials, the two men were taken prisoner during combat with six Chinese fighters embedded in Russian units near the front line. The captives were found carrying Chinese identification documents and bank cards, which were shared in an accompanying video clip.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha took swift diplomatic action, summoning China’s chargé d'affaires in Kyiv to explain the involvement of Chinese citizens in combat on Ukrainian soil.
“This calls into question China’s declared stance for peace,” Sybiha said in a post on X. “We strongly condemn Russia's involvement of Chinese nationals in its war of aggression against Ukraine.”
He added that such actions undermine Beijing’s credibility as a UN Security Council member and demand international scrutiny.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry responded on Wednesday, saying it was "verifying the situation" and reiterated that China urges its citizens to stay away from war zones.
“If Chinese nationals are involved, they are doing so in a personal capacity,” said ministry spokesperson Lin Jian. “The Chinese government consistently opposes any involvement in foreign armed conflicts.”
Beijing also rejected the claim that multiple Chinese fighters are in Ukraine, calling such accusations "groundless."
Reacting to the news, U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce called the reports "disturbing" and accused China of enabling Russia’s war effort, especially by supplying dual-use goods like:
“China is a major enabler of Russia’s aggression,” she said during a press briefing.
The capture of Chinese nationals follows previous reports of North Korean troops fighting on behalf of Russia. Earlier this year, Ukrainian forces reportedly captured two injured North Korean soldiers in Russia’s Kursk Oblast.
Zelensky emphasized the difference:
“North Koreans fought us in Kursk. The Chinese are fighting on Ukrainian territory.”
Reports from Western intelligence and Ukrainian officials also estimate that over 1,000 North Korean fighters have died in recent clashes.
Russia continues to rely heavily on brute-force tactics, using overwhelming numbers of personnel in what analysts describe as a “meat grinder” strategy. Foreign nationals, including those from North Korea and allegedly China, are reportedly being used to bolster Russian ranks.
President Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has now resulted in Russia occupying approximately 20% of Ukraine’s territory, primarily in the east.
While diplomatic tensions soared over the Chinese fighters, Russian drone strikes continued overnight across Ukraine:
These attacks come as part of a renewed Russian offensive, raising concerns about the future of the conflict and global alliances.
In a move that reflects growing public concern over safety and chaos, the Dutch parliament has officially voted to ban the sale and use of consumer fireworks — but the new law will not take effect until after New Year’s Eve 2025.
The decision came after months of public debate, injury reports, and criticism from law enforcement. While a majority of MPs supported the fireworks ban, they also approved a delay to avoid massive compensation claims from firework suppliers, some of whom have already invested in inventory for the upcoming season.
“This compromise postpones the inevitable, but risks one final night of mayhem,” warned Mirjam Bikker, MP from the Christian Union party.
Setting off fireworks has been a deeply rooted New Year’s tradition in the Netherlands for decades. But the celebrations have escalated into chaos, with fireworks being used not just for fun, but as weapons against emergency services and the public.
📉 According to recent data:
Many cities, including Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and The Hague, attempted local bans or created firework-free zones — but enforcement proved difficult and public disorder continued.
“We’re dealing with riots, injuries, and destruction every year,” said Nine Kooiman, head of the NPB police union, who described officers working on New Year’s as being “in a war zone.”
A recent national opinion poll revealed that three-quarters of the Dutch public now support a total consumer fireworks ban, a notable shift from previous years when such a measure would have been politically unthinkable.
This surge in public sentiment pushed key parties like the centre-right VVD and NSC — both members of the ruling coalition — to change their stance and back the ban.
However, other coalition partners opposed it, arguing that illegal fireworks, not legal sales, are the real problem.
One of the major reasons the ban was delayed until 2026 is the financial fallout. Fireworks suppliers have warned of massive losses and are seeking up to €895 million in compensation due to unsold stock.
The government estimates:
For now, lawmakers chose the less costly path, allowing one more year of fireworks sales before the consumer ban begins.
The Netherlands isn’t alone in dealing with this issue. Neighboring countries like Germany and Belgium have also experienced firework-related violence, prompting similar discussions around bans and tighter regulations.
European cities are increasingly considering official, locally run firework displays as alternatives, while banning sales to individuals — a model that may soon become the standard.
With the ban delayed, critics fear that New Year’s Eve 2025 could be the wildest yet, as individuals and groups prepare for a final blowout before restrictions take effect.
“Will it be another kind of Armageddon?” Bikker asked. “Will everyone go off the rails one more time?”
The Dutch government is now working on enhanced law enforcement measures, public awareness campaigns, and potential compensation structures ahead of the 2026 implementation.
Prince Laurent of Belgium, the younger brother of King Philippe, has lost a legal battle to claim social security benefits on top of his €388,000 (£295,850; $376,000) annual royal allowance, according to a ruling from a Belgian court.
The 61-year-old royal, who is 15th in line to the Belgian throne, argued that his charitable work and public duties entitled him to receive the same social benefits available to other Belgian residents — including reimbursement for medical expenses.
However, the court ruled against the prince, though it acknowledged ambiguities in current legislation and suggested that Belgian social security law may require reform to address such unique cases.
Speaking through his lawyer Olivier Rijckaert, Prince Laurent emphasized that the case was not financially motivated, but rooted in a principle of equality.
"Social security is granted by Belgian law to all residents, from the most deprived to the richest," Rijckaert told Le Soir. “This was not a whim, but a symbolic request.”
Despite receiving nearly €400,000 annually from state funds, Laurent claims that most of the money goes toward paying his personal assistant, covering official travel expenses, and supporting his animal welfare charity, which he has run for over a decade. What remains, he says, amounts to just €5,000 a month.
Prince Laurent took legal action after Belgium’s social security office denied his application. A preliminary hearing took place in November 2024, and the court has now ruled that while the prince may technically qualify for a pension, gaps in the law currently prevent that from happening.
The court urged lawmakers to revisit the legal framework, which does not clearly define whether royals with semi-official duties are entitled to social benefits.
At the time of writing, neither the prince nor his legal team has confirmed whether they will appeal the decision.
Prince Laurent is no stranger to controversy and has long been dubbed the “prince maudit” — or "cursed prince" — by the Belgian media.
Among his past scandals:
Despite these controversies, Laurent maintains a low political profile and lives with his British-born wife, Claire Coombs, and their three adult children.
One of the prince’s major concerns is what happens to his family after his death. Laurent has expressed worry that his royal allowance will be discontinued, leaving his wife and children without the same level of state support or social security protections.
This case raises larger questions about:
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.