Trump spares China but punishes India over Russian oil

---

China| Planet & Commerce 

The United States military has been shaken by the conviction of a Navy sailor who sold sensitive information to Chinese intelligence officers, in what prosecutors described as an “egregious betrayal.” Jinchao Wei, who served aboard the USS Essex amphibious assault ship, was found guilty of espionage, conspiracy to commit espionage, and unlawful export of defense-related technical data. He now faces sentencing on December 1, where he could receive decades in prison.

The conviction highlights growing concerns about Chinese espionage targeting the US military and comes amid a series of prosecutions involving sailors accused of leaking classified or sensitive data. While Wei was acquitted of naturalization fraud, the jury’s verdict underlined the seriousness of his actions, which US authorities said endangered both American lives and the country’s strategic security.

This article examines Wei’s case in detail, the methods used by Chinese intelligence, the vulnerabilities inside the US Navy, and the wider implications for US-China relations at a time of intense geopolitical rivalry.

Wei, a machinist’s mate responsible for operating and maintaining ship systems, was arrested on August 2, 2023 as he arrived for duty at Naval Base San Diego. According to the Justice Department, he had been recruited by a Chinese intelligence officer through social media in February 2022.

Over the next 18 months, Wei provided his handler with a steady stream of classified and restricted materials, including:

• Thousands of pages of technical and operational data from restricted-access Navy computer systems.
   
• Photos and videos of the USS Essex, a vessel central to amphibious operations.
   
• Locations of multiple Navy ships at San Diego naval base.
   

For his betrayal, Wei received more than $12,000 in payments. When confronted by the FBI after his arrest, he admitted his role and reportedly said: “I’m screwed.”

Wei was convicted on three critical charges:

1. Espionage – for delivering national defense information to a foreign power.
    
2. Conspiracy to Commit Espionage – for coordinating with Chinese intelligence.
    
3. Unlawful Export Of Defense Articles – for transmitting technical data illegally.
    

He was acquitted of naturalization fraud, a charge that alleged he lied during his path to US citizenship.

Federal prosecutors emphasized the gravity of his crimes. Adam Gordon, US attorney for the Southern District of California, declared:

“By trading military secrets to the People’s Republic of China for cash, he jeopardized not only the lives of his fellow sailors but also the security of the entire nation and our allies.”
 

The Justice Department said the conviction was a reminder that espionage threats remain real and that traitors will be pursued relentlessly.

Wei’s recruitment demonstrates the adaptability of Chinese intelligence operations. Social media platforms were used to approach him, exploiting his vulnerabilities and offering financial incentives.

This reflects a broader pattern of Chinese espionage, which often relies on cultivating relationships online, appealing to financial needs, or exploiting dual loyalties. Once inside, officers encourage targets to provide small pieces of information before gradually escalating requests to sensitive or classified data.

In Wei’s case, the method proved effective: in less than two years, he was transmitting troves of information critical to US Navy operations.

Wei’s conviction is not an isolated incident. Around the same time in California, another sailor, Wenheng Zhao, pleaded guilty to conspiring with Chinese intelligence and receiving a bribe. Zhao was sentenced to more than two years in prison.

The near-simultaneous arrests of Wei and Zhao suggest that China has systematically targeted lower-ranking sailors, who often have access to sensitive ship operations but are less likely to be under intense scrutiny than higher-ranking officers.

Such cases reveal vulnerabilities in military vetting and monitoring systems. While the US military maintains strict security protocols, financial stress, personal grievances, and ideological manipulation can still leave personnel susceptible to recruitment.

The USS Essex is an amphibious assault ship, designed to deploy Marines, aircraft, and landing craft in expeditionary operations. It plays a central role in Indo-Pacific naval strategy, where the US Navy frequently conducts exercises aimed at deterring Chinese influence.

By providing technical manuals and operational data on the Essex, Wei gave Beijing insight into:

• Maintenance and engineering vulnerabilities.
   
• Deployment readiness and tactical patterns.
   
• Operational capacities during potential conflicts in Asia.
   

Such intelligence could help China develop countermeasures in the event of hostilities, making Wei’s betrayal particularly damaging.

Espionage cases like Wei’s underline the human and strategic costs of betrayal. The price of information sold—$12,000—was minuscule compared to the potential risks: compromised missions, exposed vulnerabilities, and threats to allied navies operating alongside the US.

The Justice Department’s prosecution sends a clear message, but the broader question is whether such incidents represent isolated failures or a systemic security gap. Analysts warn that China’s aggressive espionage campaigns are not slowing down and that the US must invest more heavily in counterintelligence and personnel monitoring.

The conviction comes at a time of heightened US-China tensions:

• Washington has criticized Beijing’s military buildup in the South China Sea.
   
• China has expanded cyber and human intelligence operations against Western militaries.
   
• The US is deepening alliances with partners such as India, Japan, and Australia to counterbalance Beijing.
   

Cases like Wei’s add to the distrust clouding bilateral relations, reinforcing US perceptions of China as a hostile actor bent on undermining American security.

For allies in Europe and Asia, the conviction also highlights the risks of Chinese infiltration into military systems, raising pressure to tighten counterespionage efforts.

The conviction of US Navy sailor Jinchao Wei marks one of the most serious espionage cases in recent years, exposing both the vulnerabilities of military personnel and the persistence of Chinese intelligence efforts.

By selling sensitive information for a modest sum, Wei compromised the security of his shipmates, his country, and its allies. While his sentencing on December 1 will deliver accountability, the broader challenge for the Pentagon lies in preventing future breaches and ensuring that other personnel cannot be similarly exploited.

As the Justice Department stressed, the betrayal was a grave violation of trust—one that illustrates the stakes of modern espionage and the enduring contest between Washington and Beijing in both intelligence and military domains.

China| Planet & Commerce 

In a symbolic and politically charged move, Chinese President Xi Jinping made a rare visit to Tibet to mark the 60th anniversary of Beijing’s formal consolidation of rule over the Himalayan territory. State media portrayed the event as a festive celebration, with nearly 20,000 officials, military personnel, and locals greeting Xi in Lhasa with bouquets, flags, and choreographed dances. Yet behind the pomp lies a contentious history, deep-rooted grievances, and the simmering issue of Tibet’s political status and religious freedom.

Xi’s visit is significant not only because of its rarity—his last trip was in 2021—but also because it comes at a sensitive time. The Dalai Lama, Tibet’s exiled spiritual leader who fled after the 1959 uprising, recently turned 90 and reiterated that his reincarnation will be decided “exclusively” by his office. Beijing, however, insists it holds the right to approve his successor, a stance that threatens to inflame future tensions both in Tibet and abroad.

At the same time, Tibet remains strategically crucial to China’s geopolitical posture, particularly in relation to India, its hydropower ambitions, and its broader quest to control border regions. Xi’s speech in Tibet, emphasizing “political stability, ethnic unity, and religious harmony”, highlights Beijing’s drive to tighten its grip through Sinicisation policies while showcasing its development projects.

This article examines the political symbolism of Xi’s visit, Tibet’s contested history, China’s development strategies, the Dalai Lama succession issue, and the implications for Sino-Indian relations and broader regional geopolitics.

Xi Jinping arrived in Lhasa, the capital of the Tibet Autonomous Region, to a meticulously staged welcome. According to Xinhua News Agency, about 20,000 people from “all ethnic groups and all walks of life” lined the streets.

• Visuals broadcast by CCTV showed crowds waving red flags, children in traditional Tibetan dress, and military formations saluting Xi’s motorcade.
   
• A massive portrait of Xi hung above the gathering, reinforcing the cult of personality that accompanies his public appearances.
   
• The celebrations included parades, Tibetan dancers, and floats carrying slogans calling for ethnic unity and socialist development.
   

Xi declared that the goal was to build a “modern socialist Tibet that is united, prosperous, civilised, harmonious and beautiful.” He also stressed the need to “guide Tibetan Buddhism to adapt itself to socialist society”, signaling Beijing’s continued push to bring religion under tighter state control.

The backdrop to Xi’s visit is a long and bitter dispute over Tibet’s status. China claims the region has been part of its territory for centuries, citing historical ties to the Yuan and Qing dynasties. However, many Tibetans and international historians argue that Tibet functioned as an independent or semi-independent entity for much of its history.

• In 1913, after the fall of the Qing Dynasty, the 13th Dalai Lama declared Tibet’s de facto independence.
   
• That independence was short-lived. In 1951, following the Communist victory in China’s civil war, PLA forces occupied Tibet.
   
• In 1965, the Tibet Autonomous Region was officially established under Beijing’s control.
   

The turning point came in 1959, when the Dalai Lama fled into exile in India following a failed uprising. From Dharamshala, he established a government-in-exile, which continues to advocate for Tibetan rights and autonomy.

For many Tibetans, China’s rule has meant political repression, religious restrictions, and demographic change as large numbers of Han Chinese migrated into the region. Xi’s visit thus symbolizes Beijing’s attempt to reinforce its legitimacy in the face of lingering discontent.

During meetings with regional officials, Xi emphasized four priorities:

1. Political stability – the foundation of Beijing’s governance strategy in Tibet.
    
2. Social stability – ensuring suppression of dissent and controlling separatist sentiment.
    
3. Ethnic unity – promoting assimilation of Tibetans into the broader Chinese identity.
    
4. Religious harmony – which in practice means the Sinicisation of Tibetan Buddhism.
    

Xi’s remarks reflect the Communist Party’s long-standing policy: to ensure Tibet remains firmly under Beijing’s control through development, ideological guidance, and security measures.

Beijing’s stance on Tibetan Buddhism is particularly contentious. Xi called for “guiding” the religion to adapt to socialism, a euphemism for state oversight of monasteries, restrictions on religious teachings, and control over the Dalai Lama succession.

Perhaps the most sensitive shadow looming over Xi’s visit is the question of the Dalai Lama’s succession. The 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, is 90 years old. He has stated that his office will decide his successor, without interference from Beijing.

China, however, insists that it has the final authority to approve the reincarnation of Tibetan Buddhist leaders, citing historical precedents of imperial involvement. Critics say this is part of Beijing’s strategy to install a compliant figurehead who would serve its political agenda in Tibet.

The prospect of dueling Dalai Lamas—one recognized by Beijing and another by the Tibetan exile community— could spark global disputes, particularly with India, which hosts the current Dalai Lama.

Xi also reiterated support for the Yarlung Tsangpo dam project in Tibet, calling for its “vigorous, orderly, and efficient” completion.

• Tibet is often called “Asia’s water tower”, as its glaciers feed rivers that sustain billions of people across Asia.
   
• India has expressed concern about Chinese dam-building on the Brahmaputra River (known as Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet), fearing reduced water flows and increased geopolitical leverage for Beijing.
   

The project underscores how Tibet is not only a religious and cultural battleground but also a strategic resource hub, central to China’s environmental, economic, and military goals.

Xi’s Tibet visit coincided with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s trip to India, where both sides pledged to mend relations strained by the 2020 Galwan Valley clash, which left troops dead on both sides.

Tibet sits at the core of the Sino-Indian rivalry:

• The Dalai Lama’s presence in India continues to irritate Beijing.
   
• China’s military buildup in Tibet gives it an edge in border deployments.
   
• Hydropower projects on rivers flowing into India add another layer of tension.
   

Xi’s visit was thus not only a domestic show of control but also a signal to New Delhi that Tibet remains a red line for Beijing.

Tibet remains largely closed to journalists and foreign observers, making it difficult to independently verify conditions. However, human rights groups have long accused Beijing of:

• Suppressing Tibetan culture and language.
   
• Restricting religious freedoms by controlling monasteries and surveillance of monks.
   
• Forcing assimilation through education policies and demographic engineering.
   

Xi’s message of harmony contrasts sharply with reports of repression. His omission of any mention of the Dalai Lama during the visit is also telling, as Beijing seeks to erase his influence domestically while waiting for a succession it can control.

Xi Jinping’s rare visit to Tibet to celebrate 60 years of Chinese rule was a carefully staged display of power and legitimacy. While state media highlighted parades, dancers, and declarations of unity, the underlying tensions surrounding Tibet’s history, religion, and geopolitical role remain unresolved.

From the looming Dalai Lama succession crisis to hydropower disputes with India, Tibet continues to be a strategic fault line at the intersection of religion, culture, and geopolitics. Xi’s emphasis on political stability and Sinicisation demonstrates Beijing’s intent to keep the region firmly under control, but it also reveals the limits of its acceptance among Tibetans who still yearn for greater autonomy or independence.

As the world watches, the struggle over Tibet is far from over—it is simply entering its next chapter under China’s most powerful leader in decades.