Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
A controversial law allowing South Africa’s government to expropriate land—without compensation in certain cases—has sparked outrage in the United States, leading to aid cuts from Washington and strong criticism from President Donald Trump.
There are growing concerns that South Africa could lose key US trade privileges as relations between the two nations continue to deteriorate.
South Africa is the largest beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA), a US trade agreement that grants preferential duty-free access to US markets for eligible Sub-Saharan African countries.
In January, South Africa enacted the Expropriation Act, aimed at addressing apartheid-era land disparities. Under apartheid, non-White South Africans were forcibly displaced from their lands, a legacy that continues today—three decades after racial segregation officially ended. Despite Black South Africans making up over 80% of the nation’s 63 million people, they own just around 4% of private land.
The new law grants the South African government the power to seize and redistribute land without compensation if deemed “just and equitable” and in the public interest.
President Cyril Ramaphosa defended the law, stating it would “ensure public access to land in an equitable and just manner.” However, the White House has taken a strong stance against it.
Trump, along with his South African-born adviser Elon Musk, has argued that the law discriminates against White South Africans. Sanctions followed soon after.
Reacting to Ramaphosa’s post on X (formerly Twitter) about the legislation, Musk questioned, “Why do you have openly racist ownership laws?”
On February 7, Trump signed an executive order revoking all US aid to South Africa, accusing the government of human rights violations. He also condemned South Africa’s opposition to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, stating it was undermining US national interests.
The order did not specify which aid programs were cut, but in 2023, the US committed nearly $440 million in aid to South Africa, mostly directed toward the health sector, according to the US Foreign Assistance website.
Ahead of Trump’s announcement, Ramaphosa noted that apart from PEPFAR aid (the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), which makes up 17% of South Africa’s HIV/AIDS program, the country does not receive significant funding from the US.
Economist Ndumiso Kubheka told CNN that South Africa’s eligibility for AGOA could now be in jeopardy.
“Given the shifts in US trade policy and national interests, South Africa’s exclusion from AGOA is a real possibility,” Kubheka said.
To qualify for AGOA, countries must demonstrate respect for rule of law, human rights, and must not act against US foreign policy interests, according to AGOA’s official criteria.
On February 11, US Rep. Andy Ogles and three other Republican lawmakers sent a letter to Trump, urging him to withdraw South Africa’s duty-free trade access and suspend diplomatic ties. They cited concerns over land reform policies, South Africa’s alleged "vendetta against Israel," and its growing alignment with China.
South Africa’s agricultural sector plays a crucial role in the country’s economy, contributing 10% of total export earnings in 2021, according to the National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC).
The US Department of Agriculture has identified South Africa as AGOA’s largest agricultural exporter, with two-thirds of its agricultural exports to the US benefiting from duty-free access.
Key South African exports to the US under AGOA include:
Victor Thindisa, a senior manager for Markets and Economic Research at NAMC, warned that losing AGOA status would deal a severe blow to South Africa’s agricultural industry.
“South Africa could face an average tariff increase of around 3% on agricultural exports to the US if removed from AGOA,” Thindisa said.
The potential consequences include:
The ongoing dispute over South Africa’s land expropriation policy has strained diplomatic ties with the US, leading to aid cuts and the potential threat of AGOA exclusion. If South Africa loses its trade privileges, the economic impact—especially on its agriculture exports—could be significant.
With the US demanding policy changes, South Africa now faces tough choices in balancing domestic land reform goals with the risk of economic fallout from deteriorating US relations.
A powerful rebel coalition has claimed control of yet another mining town in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), just over a week after capturing the region’s largest city, Goma.
Clashes between the Alliance Fleuve Congo (AFC) rebel coalition and Congolese forces have resulted in over 3,000 deaths in under two weeks, according to DRC’s government.
The AFC, which includes the M23 armed group, took over Nyabibwe, a mineral-rich town, last week—shortly after Goma, the provincial capital of North Kivu, fell on January 27. The M23, which claims to represent the interests of the Rwandophone minority, has long been accused of fueling instability in the resource-rich region.
This takeover follows a similar move last year, when the rebels captured Rubaya, another mining hub in eastern DRC, home to one of the world’s largest coltan deposits—a crucial mineral used in smartphone production.
For decades, DRC—a nation of over 100 million people—has been plagued by violent militia conflicts, driven by ethnic and resource-based disputes. The M23 and dozens of other armed groups have been at the center of bloody battles for control over the region's vast mineral wealth.
Despite being roughly the size of Western Europe, the war-torn country holds the world’s largest reserves of cobalt and coltan—two essential minerals used in electronics manufacturing.
However, the World Bank notes that most Congolese citizens have not benefited from this wealth. DRC remains among the five poorest countries globally, with much of its mineral riches controlled by the government and armed groups operating in the eastern region.
“Access to natural resources is at the heart of this conflict,” said Jean Pierre Okenda, an expert in extractive industries governance.
“It’s no coincidence that rebel-controlled areas are mining zones. Global demand for cobalt and coltan has fueled this crisis.”
“Waging war requires financing, and controlling mining sites funds these conflicts,” he added.
Victor Tesongo, spokesperson for the AFC-M23 alliance, confirmed to CNN that the group controls the coltan-rich mines in Rubaya and Nyabibwe. However, he did not disclose how much revenue the group earns from these resources or how the funds are utilized.
A United Nations official, however, provided insight into the financial operations of the rebels.
Bintou Keita, the UN Secretary-General’s Special Representative to DRC, told the Security Council in September that coltan from Rubaya accounts for over 15% of global tantalum production. She estimated that M23 earns around $300,000 per month from coltan sales.
While M23 denies profiting from the mines, claiming its presence in Rubaya is purely humanitarian, the Congolese government and international community have repeatedly accused neighboring Rwanda of backing M23 and facilitating the looting of DRC’s mineral wealth.
UN experts estimate that between 3,000 and 4,000 Rwandan soldiers are actively supporting M23 fighters in eastern DRC—outnumbering the rebels themselves.
A December UN report revealed that at least 150 tons of coltan had been illegally exported to Rwanda, where it was blended with local production to obscure its origins.
DRC Communications Minister Patrick Muyaya told CNN last week that Rwanda’s mineral exports surged after its forces took control of key mining areas in DRC.
Despite widespread allegations, Rwandan President Paul Kagame denied knowledge of Rwandan troops operating in DRC, insisting that Rwanda sources coltan from its own mines.
In a previous speech, Kagame admitted that Rwanda acts as a transit hub for smuggled minerals but denied stealing from DRC.
“People come from Congo, whether through smuggling or legal channels, bringing minerals here. But they don’t stay in Rwanda—they are sent to Dubai, Brussels, Tel Aviv, and Russia,” Kagame said, without specifying which minerals were involved.
The U.S. Treasury Department reported in 2022 that over 90% of DRC’s gold was being smuggled to neighboring Uganda and Rwanda, where it was then refined and exported to global markets, particularly the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A Belgian businessman was sanctioned for facilitating this trade.
When it comes to other valuable minerals like coltan and cobalt, the full extent of illegal exports remains unclear.
In December, DRC filed a lawsuit against Apple subsidiaries in Belgium and France, accusing the company of sourcing conflict minerals. Apple has denied these allegations.
Every year, major tech companies—such as Apple and Microsoft—release reports outlining their commitment to responsible mineral sourcing.
In a 2023 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Apple stated that while it sources tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold (3TG) and other minerals like cobalt and lithium from DRC, it remains committed to international due diligence standards.
The company added that after extensive audits, no reasonable evidence suggested that its suppliers directly or indirectly financed armed groups in DRC or its neighboring countries.
As the global demand for smartphones, electric vehicles, and other electronics grows, so does the competition for the minerals needed to manufacture them.
For the people of DRC, this has translated into endless cycles of war, displacement, and suffering, as armed groups and foreign actors battle for control of the country’s resources.
With rebels seizing more mining towns and regional tensions escalating, the conflict over DRC’s vast mineral wealth shows no signs of abating.
A group of white South Africans gathered outside the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria on Saturday, expressing support for President Donald Trump and claiming discrimination by their own government.
Hundreds of protesters, many from the Afrikaner community, held signs reading "Thank God for President Trump" while denouncing South African laws they believe unfairly target the white minority.
The demonstration came a week after Trump signed an executive order cutting aid and assistance to the Black-led South African government. In the order, Trump alleged that Afrikaners—descendants of Dutch colonial settlers—are being unfairly targeted by a new land expropriation law, which allows the government to seize private land without compensation under certain conditions.
The South African government has strongly refuted these claims, maintaining that the law is not racially motivated. Officials argue that Trump's statements misrepresent the policy, emphasizing that no land has been expropriated under the new legislation.
Trump's executive order also referred to Afrikaners as "racially disfavored landowners" and included a proposal to grant them refugee status in the United States, despite them being only one segment of South Africa’s white minority.
Addressing Parliament this week, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa reassured the nation that forced removals of any group would never be permitted again, recalling the pain of dispossession endured by millions of Black South Africans under apartheid and colonial rule.
"The people of this country know the pain of forced removals," Ramaphosa said.
"The land law does not allow arbitrary land seizures but aims to redistribute land for the public good."
The South African government insists that the land reform initiative seeks to address historical injustices, where the majority of farmland remains under white ownership, despite white South Africans comprising just 7% of the population.
In addition to land expropriation, protesters voiced opposition to affirmative action policies that have been in place since the end of apartheid in 1994. These Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) laws, designed to increase opportunities for Black South Africans, have long been a source of frustration for some white citizens.
Elon Musk, a South African-born billionaire and Trump adviser, has repeatedly criticized the government, accusing it of being anti-White. His motives, however, have been questioned, particularly after his failure to secure a license for his Starlink satellite internet service in South Africa due to non-compliance with the country’s affirmative action laws.
While racial issues remain central to South African politics, the country has been largely successful in fostering national unity since the end of apartheid. The current government is composed of a coalition of 10 Black-led and white-led political parties, working together despite ongoing tensions over land reform and economic policies.
Sign up to hear from us about specials, sales, and events.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.